RADIO. IT IS WHAT IT IS. NOT WHAT SOME WOULD LIKE IT TO BE- OR BECOME. IT'S
AMAZING HOW MANY PUNDITS AND OBSERVERS WANT RADIO TO MORE LIKE THE
INTERNET. YES, WE'RE ALL TRYING TO ATTRACT MANY OF THE SAME PEOPLE TO
LISTEN TO OUR OFFERINGS, BUT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE. WE'RE BOTH MEDIA, BUT
THE DELIVERY MECHANISM IS MUCH DIFFERENT. ONE IS FREE, THE OTHER IS PAID
FOR. ONE ARRIVES AT YOUR EARS VIA FREQUENCY WAVES, THE OTHER THROUGH
HARD WIRES,CABLE AND OTHER EQUIPMENT. SO, THE FIRST CHOICE MENTIONED IS RADIO, THE OTHER(LATTER)CHOICE IS THE INTERNET. ONE COULD REPLACE THE
OTHER, BUT THEY CAN NEVER BE ONE AND THE SAME. BOTH MEDIA...DIFFERENT
VEHICLES. JUST AS AIRPLANES, BOATS AND TRAINS ARE ALL TRANSPORTATION, BUT DIFFERENT VEHICLES AND DIFFERENT WAYS TO GET TO WHERE YOU'RE GOING.
ONE COULD REPLACE THE OTHERS, OR BECOME MORE PREFERRED OVER OTHERS, BUT THEY CAN NEVER BE ONE AND THE SAME. COMMON SENSE. WHY IS IT THAT
SO MANY INDUSTRY PEOPLE WANT TO MAKE RADIO INTO AN INTERNET SOURCE.
CAN'T HAPPEN. SHOULDN'T HAPPEN. RADIO MUST VIE IN THE MARKETPLACE OF
IDEAS AND COST EFFECTIVENESS TO BE THE MOST PREFERRED MEDIA OVER ALL
OTHER SOURCES. IF THE PRODUCT IS BETTER, AND THE COST IS MUCH BETTER,
THERE SHOULD BE SOLID COMPETITION FOR THE LARGEST AUDIENCE. AT LEAST THAT'S THE WAY I THINK. THE PROBLEM TODAY IS, THE RADIO INDUSTRY LEADERS
WANT TO GIVE UP OR GIVE IN TO THE FASTER GROWING INTERNET COMPETITORS.
IT'S THE PRODUCT AND PRESENTATION OF THAT PRODUCT IS WHAT REALLY MATTERS. PUT REAL PROFESSIONAL'S ON THE AIR, PROGRAM IT FOR MASS APPEAL
OR A DESIRED AUDIENCE, AND THE LISTENER WILL FIND YOU, JUST AS YOU FOUND
THIS PAGE. THE LISTENER-LIKE THE SHOPPER-IS ALWAYS LOOKING FOR THE BEST
PRODUCT AT THE BEST PRICE AND AT THE EASIEST TO FIND VENUE. WE IN RADIO
HEARD THE SAME OLD "THE SKY IS FALLING" SCARE SCENARIOS WHEN TELEVISION
CAME INTO PLAY. NOT ONLY DID RADIO SURVIVE IT'S VISUAL COMPETITOR, IT
THRIVED. THERE IS HOPE RADIO FRIENDS. IT JUST TAKES THOSE WITH COURAGE
TO MAKE BROADCASTING OVER THE AIR ALIVE, LIVE AND FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND AGAIN. THAT'S MY RADIOPINION, WHAT'S YOURS?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Online betting is just another rapidly growing diversion in the visual community. You will bet on the sport you choose through websites on the internet. All the details of betting are stated clearly on the site itself, including the possible amount that you may get if you'll win. [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/bg/]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/da/]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/de/]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/es]apuestas[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/fr/]jouer en ligne[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/gr]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/jp]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/nl]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/pl]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/pt]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/ro]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/ru]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/se]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/it]bet online[/url] [url=http://www.pulsebet.com/cn]bet online[/url] Now you would like to place your bet in the hopes of winning $100 from each wager. You would bet your $110 against the spread on the Chargers to win and cover (win by 3 or more points), and $110 for a total score of 44-points and a total wager of $220. If the Chargers roll to a 31-20 victory and you have won both of your bets. The Chargers 11-point margin of victory was more than enough to cover the spread of 3 points needed to get the win for $100. A total score of 51-points at the end of the game also means you have won your over/under bet for another $100 stack. http://www.pulsebet.com/bg/ http://www.pulsebet.com/da/ http://www.pulsebet.com/de/ http://www.pulsebet.com/es/ http://www.pulsebet.com/fr/ http://www.pulsebet.com/gr/ http://www.pulsebet.com/jp/ http://www.pulsebet.com/nl/ http://www.pulsebet.com/pl/ http://www.pulsebet.com/pt/ http://www.pulsebet.com/ro/ http://www.pulsebet.com/ru/ http://www.pulsebet.com/se/ http://www.pulsebet.com/it/ http://www.pulsebet.com/cn/
I love garyallynsradiopinion.blogspot.com! Here I always find a lot of helpful information for myself. Thanks you for your work.
Webmaster of http://loveepicentre.com and http://movieszone.eu
Best regards
buy facebook likes
get facebook likes
http://www.visualizing.org/visualizations/egypt-influence-network http://thedaringkitchen.com/in-the-kitchen/new-and-improved-faq-different-location
buy facebook likes get facebook likes facebook likes
I have a piece of adware on my computer that I obviously wish to get rid of (it slows down my computer... -.-). Avira Free Version is a perfectly fine antivirus program, but apparently it does not have this (insert obscene adjective here) adware on its detection list. I looked into this adware a bit more and found that AVG should have it on its detection list, which would mean a :D for me and a :( for the adware... elimation of the adware in other words. There are several problems with this idea, though. 1. I am not sure about this, but I believe I read somewhere that having multiple AVs (AntiVirus) may cause confliction between programs... is this true? (read titular question for the specifics) 2. Supposing that the above question were answered with a "Yes", I would have to remove Avira. I have also read that this action is difficult to fully complete... is this true and if so, how would I go about screwing the adware (FYI it is called WhenU SaveNow, and it is despicable in my personal opinion)? 3. Should someone else incidentally have this (virus? adware? program?)... thing... and have successfully removed it, could you answer back with your solution? Notes about the *censor*ing software... I am aware that you (ahem) should (ahem) be able to remove the "thing" (I refuse to name it except in an above example) in Windows' Add/Remove Programs panel. It is not a part of the list of removable items, so I assume it must have latched onto a download (silly brother >:O). Because my computer is second-hand, it has a variety of rather shifty programs (in my paranoid opinion). Flock I think is decent, Limewire... not so decent, my idiot brother's downloads off Limewire... VERY untrustworthy. However, the adware might have been present before that bozo downloaded Limewire, so I can't fix the blame on Limewire. Also, this adware updates itself and seems to "read" the content on the web pages I browse and display related content... fortunately, it does not understand Mandarin. The adware PHAILS (phails, fails, same thing) in that it displays its unconvincingly poor "Click me" (the "click me" idea is displayed in many ways...) ideas in Internet Explorer while I browse in Mozilla Firefox -.- Any solution would be welcome.
facebook likes get facebook likes [url=http://1000fbfans.info]get facebook likes [/url] buy facebook likes
Post a Comment